My understanding is that contrary to your brother's idea of "disability" the ADA only protects a person in recovery who is no longer engaging in the current illegal use of drugs. And I speculate - but do not know for sure - that many local and state agencies follow ADA guidelines.
See a repetition of the "cramming" theme: before, to get as much drug use in as possible before having to quit, this time to spent as much time with you in an interval as possible. If that isn't actually a dymanic of his, it seems to at least be something in your mind.
That's an astute observation ... he "races" mentally quite a bit. I do think that it's partly a result of not seeing me often (once a month on average), but it's more than that. Thank you for reading and sharing your comment, David.
My understanding is that contrary to your brother's idea of "disability" the ADA only protects a person in recovery who is no longer engaging in the current illegal use of drugs. And I speculate - but do not know for sure - that many local and state agencies follow ADA guidelines.
See a repetition of the "cramming" theme: before, to get as much drug use in as possible before having to quit, this time to spent as much time with you in an interval as possible. If that isn't actually a dymanic of his, it seems to at least be something in your mind.
That's an astute observation ... he "races" mentally quite a bit. I do think that it's partly a result of not seeing me often (once a month on average), but it's more than that. Thank you for reading and sharing your comment, David.